Sunday, January 27, 2019
Ralph Waldo Emerson vs. Walt Whitman Essay
In their respective fields, some(prenominal) Walt Whitman and Ralph Waldo Emerson were considered to be quintessential American writers. Their thoughts and statements regarding nonconformity and individuality were revolutionizing for the era that they lived. Thanks to them,similar thoughts and statements, be now much more mainstream and unexceptional.Although they used different tactics to digest their points across, their shared opinions become evident.Both Walt Whitman and Ralph Waldo Emerson believed strongly in originality and personal human facealthough the different tactics that they used to piss their message across were nada short of contrasting.In Emersons case, he was vehemently opposed to a clubhouse that he saw to be oppressive and unimaginative. Emerson was convinced that alone of modern human civilization was in collaboration to crush his uniqueness and overmaster him to a life of a faceless cog. rules of order is in conclave against the manhood of every one of its members. (P. 153)Conversely, Whitman regarded the common man with much esteem and favoritism. In his larger-than-life poem, Song of Myself Whitman spoke of the working class with an unusual favoring and support of their shipway and lifestyle. The sun falls on the crisply hair and mustache, falls on the black of his polishd and perfect limbs, and I lay eyes on the bewitching giant and love him. (P.173) Whitman encouraged the reader to lead an original and unconfirmed life. He celebrated the common man and tells the reader to be blissful with their life and social stature.These ideals might appearm as if completely different, hardly the points that they try to get across, are exactly the same. They are both stating that one should turn its back on the complex structure that is hostel and or else live a simple (although by no means primal or unoriginal) life, unconstrained by conforming and strict social usage or procedures.The tones of Emersons poems and Whitmans ess ay, were quite contrasting. Emersons essay seemed almost cold and apocalyptic contrasted to Whitmans comparatively delightful and uplifting poem. In Self Reliance, Emerson speaks of bon ton with disgust and suspicion. He sees it all as a cruel masquerade that binds hapless souls to its iron will. Society never advances. It recedes as fast on one side as it gains on another. (P.152) In Song of Myself, Whitman speaks in flourishes and silky verses. You sea I resign myself to you also I guess what you mean, I behold from the beach your crooked fingers. (P.180)Emersons essay was very philosophical and coarse to personal interpretation (A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of slight minds P. 144), while Whitmans poem was more detailed and vividly coarse (The beards of the young men glistend with wet, it ran from their long hair, P. 173). likewise notable, is the fact that Whitman spoke to the reader to the highest degree what he perceives and his personal opinions. (I guess it must be the flag of my disposition. P. 170),while Emerson spoke more about facts that he knew to be true, leaving it up the reader to agree or not. Another sort of false prayers are our regrets. (P. 150)From this, it is obvious to see that their penning styles and personal tactics differed greatly when it came to persuading someone of a particular cause.Emerson and Whitman both strived for more originality in society. Whitman was dedicated to creating an authentic American conciseness by dint of his writing, one that was not made up of cast off European procedures. Emerson was committed to freeing the minds and let loose the originality, which he saw society holding back. Society is a joint stock company, in which the members agree, for the better securing of his bread to each shareholder, to surrender the liberty and culture of the eater. (P.140)It is evident to see that both Walt Whitman and Ralph Waldo Emersonstrongly felt the need to free, warn, or otherwise inform societ y of their findings and opinions. Thanks to this sense of obligation and perspective liberty, we all now get to enjoy many other informative do-gooders like them, eager to give the axe and enlighten us in all aspects of life. Ironically, in their attempts to free us of the torture that is society, they have unleashed a quintessential component that makes their fear and underground to this civilization too accurate indeed.That would be telemarketing.