Thursday, January 31, 2019
Cultural Purity and the Refute of the Inevitable Momentum :: essays papers
Cultural Purity and the Refute of the Inevitable nervous impulseIn the introduction to The Pure Products Go Crazy, James Clifford offers a meter by William Carlos Williams rough a housekeeper of his named Elsie. This girl is of mixed blood, with a carve up common ancestry, and no real collective roots to trace. Williams begins to make the musing that this is the direction that the world is moving in, as Clifford puts itan inevitable momentum. Clifford believes in that, in an interconnected world, one is always to varying degrees, inauthentic. In making this statement, Clifford is mayhap only partially accurate. In the western hemisphere, where Williams was located, perhaps it can be said directly that the influence of raw society has attributed to the lack of general ancestry, as one refining after another has blended with the next. mayhap it can be said as well that, as Clifford puts it, in that location seem no distant places left on the planet where the mien of moder n products, media, and power cannot be felt (Clifford, 14). The intention of this paper is to get off first that there is essentially such a thing as pure culture, and contrary to Cliffords belief, that there are pure unhomogenised cultures that remain (while not altogether untouched by foreign influence), born(p) within themselves. It allow be argued as well that the influence of modern society does not necessarily lead to a loss of heathenish soundness itself, but rather that a presence of certain cultural practices within the respective cultures has attributed to the lasting purity of certain cultures. In this case, we will be discussing the cultures that exist in Haiti and Bali. To address the first part of my argument, we clenched fist must take in hand what exactly is this pure culture that has been mentioned thus far. Clifford believes that cultures, for the sake of the argument being made can be said to be impure cultures, have had to reckon with the forces of pr ogress and subject unification, and that essentially this has led to many traditions, languages, cosmologies, and values being lost, some literally bump off (Clifford, 16). He argues that inevitably, all cultures either will, or have experienced this, and in the end have transformed into an alternate version of themselves. I point that a pure culture is one that has either not had to push-down stack with such circumstances, or has dealt with outside influences, without altering what is wholly exclusive about itself.